Skip to content
The business of working for yourself
Biz Wealth FocusThe business of working for yourself

Cash Flow

The costs that keep arriving when the work stops

Every business has a level of spending that continues whether or not anybody is buying, and the size of it decides how long a bad quarter can run before it becomes something worse.

By Hannah Whitfield3 min read

Close-up of hands exchanging real estate documents in an office setting.
Photograph by RDNE Stock project via Pexels
General information. This is journalism, not personalised financial advice. Rates, rules and figures change and vary by country — check current terms before acting. How we work.

Two kinds of spending behave completely differently

Some costs exist because a job exists: materials, subcontracted work, the fuel to get there, anything bought for a specific customer. If there is no work, there is no cost, and these look after themselves in a downturn.

The rest arrive on a schedule regardless. Rent, insurance, vehicle costs, the software the business runs on, professional fees, storage, a phone line, the annual renewals nobody remembers agreeing to. That second group is the standing cost of existing, and it’s the number that decides how a quiet period actually feels.

Work out the monthly figure and keep it somewhere visible

Almost nobody in a very small business can state their standing cost per month, which is odd given how much depends on it. It is an hour’s work with a bank statement: identify everything that would still be charged if you took a month off, convert annual items to a monthly share, and total it.

That figure answers several questions at once. It tells you how much the business has to earn before anything is being achieved. It tells you how large a reserve has to be to cover a given number of empty months. And it makes the effect of a new commitment legible, because a modest monthly subscription is now visibly a permanent increase in the amount you must earn every month forever.

A fixed cost is a promise made on behalf of a future you

Committing to a recurring payment is a decision taken in a confident month that binds the business in months that may be far less confident. That is not an argument against ever doing it. It is an argument for noticing that it is what you are doing.

The asymmetry is what makes it dangerous. Adding a commitment takes five minutes and removing one takes a notice period, a conversation and sometimes a penalty. In a business whose income can halve for a season, that asymmetry is the difference between an uncomfortable quarter and one that cannot be survived without borrowing.

They accumulate where nobody is looking

Standing costs rarely arrive as a decision. They arrive one at a time, each small enough not to warrant thought, and they are almost never reviewed as a group. A tool taken on for one project and still charged for two years later. A service kept because cancelling it would take an afternoon. A larger workspace than the business now needs.

An annual review of the whole list, item by item, against the question of what would actually break if it stopped, is one of the highest-return hours in a small business. The usual outcome is a handful of removals and a couple of things renegotiated, and the saving is permanent rather than one-off.

Keeping the base low is a strategy

A business with a low standing cost can survive a long thin period, decline work it doesn’t want, and wait for a better client. A business with a high one has to keep the machine fed, which shows up as accepting jobs at prices it would otherwise refuse, and that is a slow way to end up somewhere you did not choose.

This is the practical argument for renting instead of buying early, for flexible arrangements over cheap long ones, and for resisting the impulse to equip the business for the volume you hope to have rather than the volume you have. Flexibility costs more per month and buys the ability to be wrong, which in the first years is worth a great deal.

When taking one on is the right call

None of this means the answer is always no. A fixed cost that reliably reduces a larger variable one, or that removes a constraint genuinely holding the business back, is worth taking. So is anything required to do the work properly, or to meet an obligation.

The test is whether you could still meet it comfortably in your worst realistic quarter, and whether you know how you would get out of it if you had to. If both answers are satisfactory the commitment is fine. If either one is a shrug, the honest position is that the business is betting on conditions continuing, and it should at least know that is what it is doing.

Cash Flowcashflowcostsriskplanning
Hannah Whitfield
Senior writer, Biz Wealth Focus

Hannah covers starting out, pricing, cash flow and the questions readers actually send in and prefers a plain explanation to a clever one.